Acceleration Over Level: Why Markets Trade the Second Derivative
50 years of data reveal a counter-intuitive truth: the best stock returns come when the economy is contracting but improving. Direction of change matters more than level.
The Trade: Positioning for Momentum Regimes
Current Setup
- IP YoY: +1.20% (growing)
- IP Acceleration: +1.85pp (accelerating)
- Regime: Growing & Accelerating
Positioning
- Overweight: COP, XOM, INTC, MSFT
- Underweight: Banks (JPM, BAC)
- Watch for: Deceleration signal
Historical Edge
Growing & Accelerating is paradoxically the worst regime at +1.09%/mo. Best returns come from "Contracting & Improving" at +2.52%/mo.
66 Years of Macro Acceleration: Industrial Production, Employment, and Inflation
Annual acceleration (change in YoY growth rate) for three key indicators, 1960-2025
Source: FRED. Acceleration = Current YoY minus Prior Year YoY. Positive = improving momentum.
Wall Street obsesses over levels. Is GDP growth positive or negative? Is unemployment high or low? Is inflation above or below target? But 66 years of data reveal a more nuanced truth: markets care more about the direction of change than the level itself.
This is the "second derivative" insight. The first derivative tells you how fast something is changing (YoY growth rate). The second derivative tells you whether that rate of change is accelerating or decelerating. When Industrial Production growth is negative but improving, stocks rally in anticipation of recovery. When growth is positive but slowing, stocks struggle despite the still-good headline number.
Why This Matters Now
We're currently in "Growing & Accelerating" - IP is up +1.20% YoY with positive momentum (+1.85pp acceleration). Counter-intuitively, this is historically the worst regime for stocks at just +1.09%/mo average. The best opportunities come when the economy transitions - either improving from contraction or slowing from expansion.
I. The Four Regimes Framework
By combining level (growing vs contracting) with direction (accelerating vs decelerating), we create four distinct regimes:
- Growing & Accelerating - Good and getting better. Sounds ideal, but stocks average only +1.09%/mo. The good news is already priced in.
- Growing & Decelerating - Good but slowing. Stocks average +1.84%/mo as Fed easing expectations emerge.
- Contracting & Improving - Bad but getting better. The best regime at +2.52%/mo. Markets anticipate recovery.
- Contracting & Worsening - Bad and getting worse. Stocks average +1.47%/mo - not as bad as expected because prices already reflect pessimism.
Stock Performance by Momentum Regime (50 Years)
Average monthly returns (%) for individual stocks across four IP acceleration regimes. 612 months of data.
| Stock | Turnaround | Expansion | Slowdown | Recession | Business |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ticker | Contract+Improve | Grow+Accel | Grow+Decel | Contract+Worse | Description |
| F | +5.36 | +0.71 | +1.34 | +1.16 | Ford Motor - Auto cyclical |
| AAPL | +5.29 | +1.86 | +2.76 | +1.96 | Apple - Consumer tech |
| DE | +4.43 | +0.79 | +1.90 | +1.28 | Deere - Agricultural equip |
| PHM | +4.29 | +1.04 | +2.84 | +4.33 | PulteGroup - Homebuilder |
| JPM | +4.18 | +0.49 | +2.16 | +1.42 | JPMorgan - Bank |
| BAC | +4.04 | +0.72 | +1.88 | +1.76 | Bank of America - Bank |
| MMM | +3.49 | +0.61 | +1.26 | +1.11 | 3M - Industrial conglomerate |
| GS | +2.87 | +0.27 | +3.16 | +0.96 | Goldman Sachs - Inv bank |
| HD | +2.82 | +1.73 | +2.21 | +3.23 | Home Depot - Home improvement |
| CAT | +2.81 | +1.07 | +1.62 | +1.31 | Caterpillar - Heavy equip |
| LLY | +2.80 | +1.09 | +2.02 | +1.08 | Eli Lilly - Pharma |
| ABT | +2.57 | +1.12 | +1.60 | +1.62 | Abbott Labs - Healthcare |
| COST | +2.49 | +1.38 | +2.42 | +1.19 | Costco - Warehouse retail |
| DIS | +2.40 | +0.64 | +1.89 | +1.68 | Disney - Entertainment |
| MSFT | +1.32 | +2.36 | +2.26 | +2.50 | Microsoft - Software |
| INTC | +0.83 | +2.35 | +1.23 | +1.62 | Intel - Semiconductors |
| COP | +0.49 | +1.82 | +1.41 | -0.06 | ConocoPhillips - Energy |
| XOM | +0.82 | +1.39 | +1.44 | +0.50 | Exxon Mobil - Energy |
Returns are average monthly percentages. Green highlighting for values > +2.5%. N = 612 months (1975-2025) for most stocks.
Average Returns by Regime
Regime Frequency (612 months)
II. Why Turnarounds Outperform
The "Contracting & Improving" regime produces the best stock returns for three interconnected reasons:
1. Expectations are low. When IP is contracting, pessimism is priced in. Earnings estimates have been cut. Multiples have compressed. There's nowhere to go but up, and any improvement triggers upward revisions.
2. Fed policy turns supportive. Improving momentum from contraction typically coincides with rate cuts or expectations thereof. The 2010 recovery (+17% IP acceleration) came with QE2. The 2021 recovery (+11.5% acceleration) came with zero rates and massive stimulus.
3. Operating leverage kicks in. Companies that cut costs during contraction see margins explode when revenue stabilizes. A 5% revenue increase on a leaner cost base can mean 20%+ earnings growth.
The Expansion Trap
"Growing & Accelerating" sounds like the perfect environment, but it's actually the worst for stocks at +1.09%/mo. Why? Because everyone already knows the economy is strong. Valuations expand during the improvement phase. By the time acceleration is confirmed, the easy money has been made. Late-cycle earnings beats meet "priced for perfection" multiples.
III. Stock Selection by Regime
Turnaround Plays (Contract + Improve)
These stocks surge when the economy stops getting worse. High operating leverage, cyclical exposure, and beaten-down valuations create the conditions for explosive returns.
Expansion Plays (Grow + Accelerate)
When growth is accelerating from an already-positive base, favor companies with high revenue sensitivity to economic activity. Tech and energy outperform as demand exceeds expectations.
Slowdown Plays (Grow + Decelerate)
Growth stocks and consumer discretionary shine when the economy is still growing but decelerating. The Fed pivots dovish, rate-sensitive sectors rally, and quality premiums compress.
Recession Defensives (Contract + Worse)
When the economy is contracting and still worsening, homebuilders and retailers paradoxically outperform. Why? Rate cut expectations drive these rate-sensitive names higher even as the economy deteriorates.
Stock Fundamentals
| Stock | Company | Sector | Mkt Cap ($B) | P/E | Div Yield | Best Regime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Apple Inc. | Technology | $3,775.6 | 34.1 | 0.40% | Turnaround |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | Technology | $3,418.2 | 32.6 | 0.74% | Recession |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Financial Services | $850.6 | 15.3 | 1.86% | Turnaround |
| BAC | Bank of America | Financial Services | $386.8 | 12.7 | 2.04% | Turnaround |
| HD | The Home Depot, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | $378.5 | 25.9 | 2.42% | Recession |
| CAT | Caterpillar Inc. | Industrials | $303.1 | 32.7 | 0.90% | Turnaround |
| GS | Goldman Sachs Group | Financial Services | $291.2 | 17.5 | 1.46% | Slowdown |
| DE | Deere & Company | Industrials | $139.1 | 27.7 | 1.26% | Turnaround |
| COP | ConocoPhillips | Energy | $122.6 | 13.8 | 3.24% | Expansion |
| F | Ford Motor Company | Consumer Cyclical | $53.3 | 11.5 | 5.51% | Turnaround |
| PHM | PulteGroup, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | $25.4 | 9.7 | 0.71% | Recession |
66 Years of Acceleration Data (1960-2025)
Full historical table showing YoY growth and acceleration for Industrial Production, Employment, and CPI.
| Year | Industrial Production | Employment | CPI Inflation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YoY % | Accel | YoY % | Accel | YoY % | Accel | |
| 2025 ← | +1.20 | +1.85 | +0.91 | -0.42 | +2.64 | -0.31 |
| 2024 | -0.65 | -0.44 | +1.34 | -0.86 | +2.95 | -1.18 |
| 2023 | -0.21 | -1.92 | +2.19 | -2.09 | +4.13 | -3.86 |
| 2022 | +1.70 | -2.71 | +4.28 | +1.38 | +7.99 | +3.31 |
| 2021 | +4.42 | +11.51 | +2.90 | +8.69 | +4.68 | +3.43 |
| 2020 | -7.09 | -6.30 | -5.79 | -7.15 | +1.25 | -0.56 |
| 2019 | -0.79 | -3.95 | +1.35 | -0.21 | +1.81 | -0.63 |
| 2018 | +3.16 | +1.95 | +1.56 | -0.02 | +2.44 | +0.31 |
| 2017 | +1.22 | +3.37 | +1.58 | -0.21 | +2.13 | +0.86 |
| 2016 | -2.15 | -0.71 | +1.78 | -0.29 | +1.27 | +1.15 |
| 2015 | -1.44 | -4.42 | +2.07 | +0.19 | +0.12 | -1.49 |
| 2014 | +2.98 | +0.99 | +1.88 | +0.23 | +1.62 | +0.15 |
| 2013 | +1.99 | -1.07 | +1.64 | -0.05 | +1.47 | -0.61 |
| 2012 | +3.07 | -0.10 | +1.70 | +0.48 | +2.07 | -1.07 |
| 2011 | +3.16 | -2.40 | +1.21 | +1.94 | +3.14 | +1.50 |
| 2010 | +5.57 | +17.00 | -0.73 | +3.60 | +1.64 | +1.96 |
| 2009 | -11.43 | -8.03 | -4.33 | -3.78 | -0.32 | -4.14 |
| 2008 | -3.40 | -6.00 | -0.55 | -1.68 | +3.81 | +0.94 |
| 2007 | +2.60 | +0.27 | +1.13 | -0.66 | +2.87 | -0.35 |
| 2006 | +2.33 | -1.03 | +1.80 | +0.08 | +3.22 | -0.14 |
| 2005 | +3.36 | +0.80 | +1.72 | +0.62 | +3.37 | +0.70 |
| 2004 | +2.56 | +1.19 | +1.10 | +1.33 | +2.67 | +0.37 |
| 2003 | +1.37 | +1.06 | -0.24 | +0.86 | +2.30 | +0.70 |
| 2002 | +0.31 | +3.29 | -1.09 | -1.14 | +1.60 | -1.22 |
| 2001 | -2.98 | -6.54 | +0.05 | -2.11 | +2.82 | -0.55 |
| 2000 | +3.56 | -0.93 | +2.16 | -0.29 | +3.37 | +1.17 |
| 1999 | +4.49 | -1.37 | +2.45 | -0.16 | +2.19 | +0.65 |
| 1998 | +5.87 | -1.43 | +2.61 | +0.01 | +1.55 | -0.79 |
| 1997 | +7.30 | +2.69 | +2.60 | +0.54 | +2.34 | -0.60 |
| 1996 | +4.60 | -0.11 | +2.05 | -0.59 | +2.94 | +0.13 |
| 1995 | +4.71 | -0.56 | +2.64 | -0.47 | +2.81 | +0.21 |
| 1994 | +5.27 | +1.98 | +3.11 | +1.14 | +2.60 | -0.37 |
| 1993 | +3.30 | +0.43 | +1.97 | +1.64 | +2.97 | -0.07 |
| 1992 | +2.87 | +4.45 | +0.33 | +1.33 | +3.04 | -1.17 |
| 1991 | -1.58 | -2.53 | -1.00 | -2.37 | +4.22 | -1.20 |
| 1990 | +0.95 | +0.05 | +1.37 | -1.16 | +5.42 | +0.63 |
| 1984 | +8.92 | +6.18 | +4.71 | +4.04 | +4.37 | +1.21 |
| 1982 | -5.20 | -6.47 | -1.76 | -2.60 | +6.16 | -4.22 |
| 1976 | +7.87 | +16.79 | +3.16 | +4.83 | +5.77 | -3.37 |
| 1975 | -8.92 | -8.67 | -1.67 | -3.60 | +9.14 | -1.87 |
Acceleration = Current year YoY minus prior year YoY. Positive values indicate improving momentum. Table shows selected years - full data in methodology.
IV. Current Positioning
As of January 2026, Industrial Production is growing (+1.20% YoY) and accelerating (+1.85pp). This places us in the "Growing & Accelerating" regime - which is paradoxically the worst for average stock returns.
However, context matters. Employment is still growing but decelerating (-0.42pp acceleration), while inflation is decelerating (-0.31pp). This mixed picture suggests we may be transitioning toward the more favorable "Growing & Decelerating" regime.
The Verdict
Direction of change dominates level. The best stock returns come when the economy is "bad but getting better." The worst come when it's "good and getting better."
- Current regime: Growing & Accelerating (weakest historically)
- Favor now: COP, XOM, INTC, MSFT (expansion plays)
- Watch for: Deceleration signal to rotate into SBUX, CMG, NKE, GS
- At contraction: Load up on F, AAPL, DE, JPM, BAC, PHM
Explore the Data
FRED Explorer
Access 800K+ economic time series including Industrial Production, Employment, and Inflation.
Open FRED Explorer →Related Insights
Methodology
Industrial Production (INDPRO) data from FRED, 1919-2025. Stock prices from daily data aggregated to monthly, 1975-2025. Acceleration defined as current YoY growth minus prior year YoY growth. Regimes classified by sign of level (positive = growing) and sign of acceleration (positive = accelerating). Returns are simple monthly percentage changes. This analysis excludes dividends.